Firm|Attorneys|Practice Areas|Events|News|Careers|Alumni|Locations
 
  Print Version   Mail Page  
NEWS
Current News
Legal News
Firm Memoranda
Publications
Cahill In the News
Rankings & Recognition
Sign up for Cahill Publications
 

Dynegy Midstream Services, LP v. Trammochem, No. 05-3544-cv (2d Cir. June 13, 2006)


Date: 06/20/06

On June 13, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed the issue of the permissibility of nationwide service of process under Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") in Dynegy Midstream Services, LP v. Trammochem. Finding that the FAA does not authorize nationwide service of process, the court reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which had ordered compliance with a subpoena duces tecum issued by an FAA arbitration panel based on its interpretation of FAA Section 7 as authorizing nationwide service of process. Because it found no authority under the FAA for nationwide service, the Court of Appeals did not address the issue of whether the FAA authorizes the service of subpoenas for production of documents only.

This memorandum is for general information purposes only and is not intended to advertise our services, solicit clients or represent our legal advice.

Download PDF File (PDF, 37.83 K)

Related Attorneys: Charles A. Gilman, Jonathan I. Mark, John J. Schuster

Related Practices: Corporate, Litigation