Firm|Attorneys|Practice Areas|Events|News|Careers|Alumni|Locations
 
  Print Version   Mail Page  
NEWS
Current News
Legal News
Firm Memoranda
Publications
Cahill In the News
Rankings & Recognition
Sign up for Cahill Publications
 

Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: Appellate Division Distinguishes Enforceable Contracts from Agreements to Agree


Date: 03/22/10

On February 4, 2010, the Appellate Division, First Department, of the Supreme Court of New York issued a decision in Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce holding that an executed "Summary of Terms and Conditions" setting forth a detailed description of the parties' financing transaction was not an enforceable agreement, but rather merely an agreement to agree dependent on a future definitive agreement.

This memorandum is for general information purposes only and is not intended to advertise our services, solicit clients or represent our legal advice.

Download: Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: Appellate Division Distinguishes Enforceable Contracts from Agreements to Agree (PDF, 30.89 K)

Related Attorneys: Charles A. Gilman, Jonathan I. Mark, John J. Schuster, Christine L. Mott

Related Practice: Litigation