Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: Appellate Division Distinguishes Enforceable Contracts from Agreements to Agree
Date: 03/22/10
On February 4, 2010, the Appellate Division, First Department, of the Supreme Court of New York issued a decision in Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce holding that an executed "Summary of Terms and Conditions" setting forth a detailed description of the parties' financing transaction was not an enforceable agreement, but rather merely an agreement to agree dependent on a future definitive agreement.
This memorandum is for general information purposes only and is not intended to advertise our services, solicit clients or represent our legal advice.
Download: Amcan Holdings, Inc. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce: Appellate Division Distinguishes Enforceable Contracts from Agreements to Agree (PDF, 30.89 K)
Related Attorneys:
Charles A. Gilman,
Jonathan I. Mark,
John J. Schuster,
Christine L. Mott
Related Practice:
Litigation
|