Firm|Attorneys|Practice Areas|Events|News|Careers|Alumni|Locations
 
  Print Version   Mail Page  
NEWS
Current News
Legal News
Firm Memoranda
Publications
Cahill In the News
Rankings & Recognition
Sign up for Cahill Publications
 

Merck & Co., Inc. v. Reynolds: U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Clarifies When Statute of Limitations Begins to Run for Securities Fraud Claims


Date: 05/03/10

A private securities fraud action must be brought within "(1) 2 years after the discovery of the facts constituting the violation; or (2) 5 years after such violation." Faced with interpreting the phrase "discovery of the facts constituting the violation," the Supreme Court held in Merck & Co., Inc. v. Reynolds that: (1) the limitations period begins to run either from the time the plaintiff actually discovered the facts constituting the violation or from the time a hypothetical reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered such facts; and (2) "facts constituting the violation" includes facts demonstrating scienter, which is a necessary element of a securities fraud claim.

This memorandum is for general information purposes only and is not intended to advertise our services, solicit clients or represent our legal advice.

Download: Merck & Co., Inc. v. Reynolds: U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Clarifies When Statute of Limitations Begins to Run for Securities Fraud Claims (PDF, 39.93 K)

Related Attorneys: Charles A. Gilman, Jonathan I. Mark, John J. Schuster,

Related Practice: Litigation