Cahill Description
Firm|Attorneys|Practice Areas|Events|News|Careers|Contact Us
 
PDF Version   Print Version   Mail Page  
PRACTICE AREAS
Antitrust
Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Corporate
Corporate Governance & Investigations
Crisis Advisory & Management
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Environmental
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Litigation
Media
Pro Bono
Real Estate
Tax
Trusts & Estates
 

Antitrust & Trade Regulation

Cahill’s antitrust practice is highly sophisticated and includes litigation and transactional representation and counseling. We assist clients with mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, and other significant transactions, and routinely advise them on antitrust aspects of distribution arrangements, intellectual property licensing, trade association activities, and pricing policies.

We have successfully represented clients in major civil and criminal investigations conducted by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the State Attorneys General. Our lawyers have participated in cross-border investigations, including the first conducted by U.S. and Canadian antitrust authorities. We have substantial experience litigating international cartel cases, and have participated in a number of cases that define the limits of the extraterritorial application of the U.S. antitrust laws, including both Statoil, the first appellate decision interpreting the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act, and Empagran, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 2004.

We have assisted in antitrust proceedings in the European Union, including merger and cartel investigations. Recently, we have been involved in representing a large marine construction company in massive treble damage litigation brought by the world's largest oil companies; a leading record producer in cases involving alleged collusive behavior in the sale of CDs; and paper distributors, an office supplier and vitamins and pharmaceutical product manufacturers in direct and indirect purchaser class actions. We represented a major chemicals producer in a merger case brought by the Department of Justice – one of the few non-hospital merger cases in recent years in which the Department of Justice's request for relief was rejected. 

Our transactional work consists principally of representation of our clients in evaluating proposed mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures, both in advising how to structure transactions to minimize or reduce antitrust concerns and in negotiating with antitrust authorities and in responding to governmental requests for information. Our work ranges from pre-merger notifications to comprehensive and nuanced economic analysis of proposed transactions, including analysis of relevant markets and likely competitive effects.

Our storied history in the field starts with such antitrust landmarks as US v. Times-Picayune (seminal tying case), US v. Associated Press (competitor access to joint ventures), US v. Grinnell Corp.(monopolization), and continues with influential cases such as Statoil (extraterritorial claims), NicSand v. 3M (en banc 6th Circuit decision on pleading antitrust injury in monopolization cases) and other hotly debated disputes.
SEE ALSO:

RECENT NEWS:

lordly-secure