Price Discrimination Among Different Food-Seller Types
August 22, 2007
Source: The New York Law Journal. Reprinted with permission.
Reversing a district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that a food wholesaler had proffered enough evidence of rivalry with a food facility manager to proceed with a Robinson-Patman Act claim. A different panel of the Third Circuit upheld a judgment that a marketer of hair-care products had not been shown to have colluded against the plaintiff.